Project Kickoff · TasGas Networks

Works Management Activation

Bringing every job, proactive, reactive and emergency, into one consistent way of logging and planning. A working session to align on scope, outcomes and the road ahead.

Prepared with Opposite
7 August 2026 · working session
Brie Jak, Nick Duck, Patrick McGrath, Joanna Adams
What this project is

Every job, logged and planned, consistently

A change initiative that's already well underway. Our job is to help activate it: land the new way of working across the teams, embed it, and hand ownership back to TasGas.

Through the funnel

Planned & corrective

Raised as a service request, checked by asset planning, then issued as a work order with everything the crew needs.

Through the funnel

Metering & asset protection

Same route. No more direct line from the raising team to a technician.

Bypass

Incident & same-day reconnects

Straight to the technician so no time is lost, and still captured as a work order.

One system

All work flows through Maximo with the same clarity, whatever its type.

Built with teams

Co-designed and tested with the people doing the work, not imposed on them.

Owned internally

We build capability so TasGas sustains the change without us.

What we're here to help with

Aims & objectives

  • Land the change on the ground. Move from "rolled out" to genuinely adopted across every team and shift.
  • Make the new way easier than the old. Reduce friction so logging in Maximo is the path of least resistance.
  • Bring people with us. Clear communication and role-based support so the change makes sense to each person.
  • Build internal capability. Equip TasGas leaders and champions to carry it forward.
  • Measure that it's working. Agree simple signals that tell us the change is sticking.
  • Transfer ownership. Progressively step back so the change lives with TasGas, not with us.
Captured in session · 7 August 2026

What does success look like?

If this project goes brilliantly, what's different in twelve months? Here is the outcome as the room described it. Still editable, so refine it as our thinking sharpens.

In a year's time, we'll know this worked because…
Captured from the session. Edits save automatically.
Trust in the funnel Manageable, realistic workload Four to six week look ahead No work without a work order
Captured in session · 7 August 2026

Key questions for today

The things we needed to get clear on together before we move. Answers below are as discussed, and remain editable.

1Who are our key stakeholders?
2Where is the change hardest?
3What's already working?
4What could get in the way?
Mapped in session · still editable

Stakeholder map

Positions reflect where the group placed each stakeholder today: support for the change, against the influence they hold. Drag to update as the picture shifts.

How this works
Field crews

Place each stakeholder on the grid

Pick up a stakeholder and drag them to show how much they support the change and how much influence they hold. Add your own, or quick-add common roles.

Won over
high influence
Champions
keep close
Watch
low priority
Supporters
keep informed
Support → ← Opposed Influence →

Add a stakeholder

Quick add
Shaped in session · still editable

Indicative timeline

Twelve months, anchored on Brie's plan: three months to gather and confirm, three months to build in Maximo, live at the six month mark. Drag to adjust as dates firm up.

How this works
Co-design

Shape the timeline together

Drag any milestone along the line to move it earlier or later. Click a milestone's name or date to rename it, or add new milestones as the plan takes shape.

Engage & co-design
Prototype & build
Roll out & embed
Session summary · 7 August 2026

What we heard

Six things that shape how we approach the activation work.

01

The change is the funnel

Six or seven streams of work currently go straight from the raising team to a tech. Everything except incident response and same day reconnects now routes through asset planning as a service request, checked for materials, instructions and permits before it becomes a work order.

02

What's lost is authority, not autonomy

Techs keep the ability to build their own day. What actually goes is the raising teams' direct line to them. That is where the resistance will sit, and billing is the sharpest example.

03

Helping is the reinforced habit

Direct calls get solved fast and everyone feels good about it. The behaviour is rewarded on both sides, so it will not be displaced by process alone. We need to name what we are retiring, not only what we are introducing.

04

Same day is an anxiety problem

Half of same day requests are for a customer moving in tomorrow. The need is reassurance rather than speed. Visible confirmation of when a job will happen is likely to solve more than doing it today.

05

Buy in follows use, not explanation

People commit once they have handled the thing. Early non functional mockups let us surface "that is not how I'd log that" before it is built, so we fix the system rather than train around it.

06

Field techs are the nexus

They can keep operating outside the system, and every other team touches them. The key message is blunt: work is not approved without a work order, and a work order only exists if it came through the process. They need backing to ask for one.

Watch list. Scope creep from teams wanting to redesign their own processes. One service delivery team leader who agrees in the room and may soften once the crews start complaining. Maximo build slippage, where an IBM escalation would stall the project. Retailer expectations of same day service that TasGas has trained over time.

Where we go from here

Next steps

Send the one page summary

Written confirmation of the approach, outcome and timeline discussed today, to be refined in the next session.

Opposite

Book the co-design planning session

One hour next week to agree the change elements we build, who gets invited to each session, and the artefacts required.

Together

Design the champion session

Champions first, so they can hold informal conversations in their teams before the pain point sessions run.

Opposite + Brie

Scope the prototype approach

Non functional mockups of the service request flow, tested with stakeholders early to de-risk the Maximo build.

Opposite

Explore a site visit

Nick to speak with Lee about dovetailing a Tasmania visit with other work, and tee up time in the field.

Nick

Share the change hub agent

Brie to share the Copilot agent once the bugs are worked through, so we can plan where it sits and how people are shown to use it.

Brie

Everything typed and mapped in this deck is saved on this device. Reopen it any time to pick up where we left off.

TasGasTasGas Works Management · Kickoff
1 / 9
Saved

Getting around

Space
Next slide
Previous slide
F
Fullscreen
Drag
Move stakeholders & milestones
Type
All answers save automatically on this device